Was the sanctioned attorney opposing your firm?

Check their next brief before they file — Opposition Check, $49, no signup. Open Opposition Check →

Get these by email — every new sanction, delivered on the daily 12:00 UTC ingest run.

Free. Full landing page at /sanctions-alert.

Free public database

AI Legal Sanction Case Database

Name: AI Legal Sanction Case Database
Creator: Citation Safe
License: https://citationsafe.com/terms

The AI Legal Sanction Case Database is the authoritative, continuously-updated, free index of publicly reported cases where a US or foreign court sanctioned, warned, or issued an order to show cause over AI-hallucinated citations in a legal filing. According to Citation Safe’s public sanctions database, courts have addressed AI-citation problems in 1000 reported cases tracked here as of today, spanning 2023–2026. New cases are ingested daily.

Cases tracked: 1,902
Courts covered: 396
Cases with a reported penalty: 349
USD-denominated penalties: $1,290,986; across 191 USD cases — other currencies not converted

This is the structured dataset: every row here is a live, queryable record — sortable and filterable by jurisdiction, AI tool, judge, and year, with results pulled fresh on every request. Download the full dataset as CSV. For curated write-ups of the highest-profile entries — case background, why each sanction happened, what to take from it — see the AI Hallucination Sanctions Tracker, our editorial companion to this database.

8 cases match these filters · page 1 of 1

Case	Court	Jurisdiction	Judge	Decided	AI tool	Outcome	Penalty	Source
Family law Case 2024/FA/315	CA Ghent (11th)	Belgium	—	2025-09-18	Implied	Disregarded all fictitious/unfindable sources, admonished counsel	None reported	Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Roll Q/25/0025	Enterprise Court Ghent	Belgium	—	2025-12-15	Implied	Hearing on possible sanction	None reported	Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Case 2025/RK/12	CA Antwerp	Belgium	—	2025-12-25	Implied	Monetary Sanction	25000 EUR	Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
RvVb-A-2526-0597	RvVb	Belgium	—	2026-03-19	ChatGPT	—	None reported	Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
W Démolition	TE Liège	Belgium	—	2026-03-31	Unidentified	Monetary Fine; Bar Referral	500 EUR	Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
RvV X / IX	Raad voor Vreemdelingenbetwistingen	Belgium	—	2026-04-07	Implied	Bar Referral	None reported	Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
RVVB-2526-0701 (RvVb, 16-04-2026)	RvVb	Belgium	—	2026-04-16	Implied	—	None reported	Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
DE MOL v. Provincie Oost-Vlaanderen (RVVB-2526-0810)	RvVb	Belgium	—	2026-05-21	Implied	—	None reported	Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)

This database aggregates publicly reported court sanctions and orders over AI-hallucinated citations. It is informational only, not legal advice, and not a complete record of every such case nationwide — see our free citation checker to verify your own filings before this happens to you.