Skip to main content
Citation Safe

Sanctions — Week of 2026-07-20

1 AI-hallucination sanction decided between 2026-07-20 and 2026-07-26 (ISO week 2026-W30). Every ruling below is sourced from the public docket — case name, decided date, outcome, AI tool implicated (when named), and any monetary penalty language pulled verbatim from the ruling.

Week at a glance

Total rulings
1
With monetary penalty
0 of 1
Courts
1
ISO week
2026-W30

Outcomes this week

  • Briefs (both Sides) Struck1

AI tool implicated

  • Implied1

This week’s read-across

One AI-hallucination ruling landed on the docket this week. Small-N weeks are the norm — the pattern is set by the trailing 12-week average, not by any individual week’s count.

Implied was the most-implicated AI tool this week (courts rarely require the attorney to name the tool by product name on the record; “Implied” means the ruling described an AI-generated brief without a product name).

The pattern each week is remarkably stable: existence failures (Layer 1) dominate. Attorneys file briefs containing citations that do not exist in any primary source — usually because a general-purpose LLM fabricated the citation and no deterministic pre-filing check caught it. Every ruling below is a preventable filing. See /verify for the pre-filing tool.

All rulings, week of 2026-07-20

Courts represented this week

Nearby weeks

Get the Sanctions Alert — a new issue every time a ruling lands.

Free double-opt-in newsletter. Case, sanction, fake cites, lesson. No promotional content.

Informational only. Not legal advice. Data derived from public court records; corrections at /contact.