Skip to main content
Citation Safe

Sanctions — Week of 2026-03-16

40 AI-hallucination sanctions decided between 2026-03-16 and 2026-03-22 (ISO week 2026-W12). Every ruling below is sourced from the public docket — case name, decided date, outcome, AI tool implicated (when named), and any monetary penalty language pulled verbatim from the ruling.

Week at a glance

Total rulings
40
With monetary penalty
11 of 40
Courts
22
ISO week
2026-W12

Week over week: 40 sanctions filed the week of 2026-03-16 vs 33 sanctions the prior week (2026-03-09) — up 7 from the prior week.

Outcomes this week

  • Warning10
  • Adverse Costs Order3
  • Adverse Costs Order; Appeal Dismissed1
  • Affirmed1
  • Appellant's Brief Stricken; Appellant's Appeal Dismissed; Bar Referral; Suspension1
  • Brief Struck1
  • Brief Struck; Adverse Costs Order; Case Dismissed With Prejudice1
  • Cost-related Relief Refused In Part Because Of Ai Misuse1
  • Costs1
  • Factor In Dismissing With Prejudice1
  • Monetary Fine1
  • Monetary Penalty1
  • Monetary Sanction1
  • Monetary Sanction & Formal Admonishment1
  • Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral; Counsel Disqualified In This Case; Order To Notify The Judgment In Other Cases; Cle; Letter Of Apology1
  • Order To Show Cause1
  • Petition Struck1
  • Report Withdrawn1
  • Sanctions Motion Denied1
  • Upcoming Sanctions1

AI tool implicated

  • Implied24
  • Unidentified11
  • ChatGPT3
  • Grammarly, ChatGPT, and Gemini1
  • Perplexity.AI1

This week’s read-across

40 rulings landed on the docket between 2026-03-16 and 2026-03-22. The most common recorded outcome this week was Warning (10 of 40). Of the 40 rulings, 11 carried an explicit monetary penalty in the ruling text.

Implied was the most-implicated AI tool this week (courts rarely require the attorney to name the tool by product name on the record; “Implied” means the ruling described an AI-generated brief without a product name).

The pattern each week is remarkably stable: existence failures (Layer 1) dominate. Attorneys file briefs containing citations that do not exist in any primary source — usually because a general-purpose LLM fabricated the citation and no deterministic pre-filing check caught it. Every ruling below is a preventable filing. See /verify for the pre-filing tool.

All rulings, week of 2026-03-16

State v. Coleman

CA Ohio · Decided 2026-03-20 · Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral; Counsel disqualified in this case; Order to notify the judgment in other cases; CLE; Letter of apology · Penalty: 2000 USD · AI tool: ChatGPT.

Read the full teardown →

Courts represented this week

Nearby weeks

Get the Sanctions Alert — a new issue every time a ruling lands.

Free double-opt-in newsletter. Case, sanction, fake cites, lesson. No promotional content.

Informational only. Not legal advice. Data derived from public court records; corrections at /contact.