Wilcox v. Gingrich
CA Indiana · Decided 2026-01-30 · AI tool: Implied.
28 AI-hallucination sanctions decided between 2026-01-26 and 2026-02-01 (ISO week 2026-W05). Every ruling below is sourced from the public docket — case name, decided date, outcome, AI tool implicated (when named), and any monetary penalty language pulled verbatim from the ruling.
Week over week: 28 sanctions filed the week of 2026-01-26 vs 36 sanctions the prior week (2026-01-19) — down 8 from the prior week.
28 rulings landed on the docket between 2026-01-26 and 2026-02-01. The most common recorded outcome this week was Warning (9 of 28). Of the 28 rulings, 3 carried an explicit monetary penalty in the ruling text.
Implied was the most-implicated AI tool this week (courts rarely require the attorney to name the tool by product name on the record; “Implied” means the ruling described an AI-generated brief without a product name).
The pattern each week is remarkably stable: existence failures (Layer 1) dominate. Attorneys file briefs containing citations that do not exist in any primary source — usually because a general-purpose LLM fabricated the citation and no deterministic pre-filing check caught it. Every ruling below is a preventable filing. See /verify for the pre-filing tool.
CA Indiana · Decided 2026-01-30 · AI tool: Implied.
E.D. Wisconsin · Decided 2026-01-30 · Brief Struck · AI tool: Implied.
BC CRT · Decided 2026-01-30 · AI tool: Implied.
NSW CAT · Decided 2026-01-30 · AI tool: Implied.
D. Nevada · Decided 2026-01-30 · Admonishment · AI tool: Implied.
High Court · Decided 2026-01-30 · Warning · AI tool: Microsoft Co-Pilot.
E.D. Missouri · Decided 2026-01-30 · Case dismissed with prejudice as a Rule 11 sanction · AI tool: Implied.
High Court · Decided 2026-01-29 · AI tool: Unidentified.
BC CRT · Decided 2026-01-29 · AI tool: Implied.
ON SCSM · Decided 2026-01-29 · The court found the submissions contained AI-like hallucinations and ordered the paralegal Ms. Derya Vural to personally pay $2,000 to opposing counsel in trust under Rule 19.06 and s.29 of the Courts of Justice Act. · Penalty: 1 · AI tool: Implied.
First-tier Tribunal · Decided 2026-01-29 · AI tool: ChatGPT.
CA California · Decided 2026-01-29 · AI tool: Implied.
W.D. Washington · Decided 2026-01-29 · Warning · AI tool: Implied.
E.D. Michigan · Decided 2026-01-28 · Two reply briefs stricken; warning · AI tool: Implied.
TA Rennes · Decided 2026-01-28 · AI tool: Implied.
GAO · Decided 2026-01-28 · Warning · AI tool: Implied.
D. Maryland · Decided 2026-01-28 · Order to Show Cause · AI tool: Implied.
GAO · Decided 2026-01-28 · Warning · AI tool: Implied.
D. Colorado · Decided 2026-01-28 · Warning · AI tool: Implied.
SC New York · Decided 2026-01-27 · Monetary Sanction; Brief struck · Penalty: 10000 USD · AI tool: Implied.
CA Arizona · Decided 2026-01-27 · Warning · AI tool: Implied.
S.D. Florida · Decided 2026-01-27 · AI tool: Implied.
W.D. Virginia · Decided 2026-01-27 · Warning · AI tool: Implied.
HRT Alberta · Decided 2026-01-27 · Dismissal of complaint upheld · AI tool: Implied.
N.D. California · Decided 2026-01-26 · Warning · AI tool: Implied.
E.D. Pennsylvania · Decided 2026-01-26 · Monetary Sanction; Order to share opinion with Professional Association · Penalty: 4000 · AI tool: Lexis+ AI; LexisNexis Protégé.
S.D. Florida · Decided 2026-01-26 · AI tool: Implied.
M.D. Florida · Decided 2026-01-26 · Warning · AI tool: Implied.
Get the Sanctions Alert — a new issue every time a ruling lands.
Free double-opt-in newsletter. Case, sanction, fake cites, lesson. No promotional content.
Informational only. Not legal advice. Data derived from public court records; corrections at /contact.