Wade v. Traincareconsult, Inc
SC California · Decided 2025-11-07 · Order to Show Cause · AI tool: Implied.
28 AI-hallucination sanctions decided between 2025-11-03 and 2025-11-09 (ISO week 2025-W45). Every ruling below is sourced from the public docket — case name, decided date, outcome, AI tool implicated (when named), and any monetary penalty language pulled verbatim from the ruling.
28 rulings landed on the docket between 2025-11-03 and 2025-11-09. The most common recorded outcome this week was Warning (7 of 28). Of the 28 rulings, 1 carried an explicit monetary penalty in the ruling text.
Implied was the most-implicated AI tool this week (courts rarely require the attorney to name the tool by product name on the record; “Implied” means the ruling described an AI-generated brief without a product name).
The pattern each week is remarkably stable: existence failures (Layer 1) dominate. Attorneys file briefs containing citations that do not exist in any primary source — usually because a general-purpose LLM fabricated the citation and no deterministic pre-filing check caught it. Every ruling below is a preventable filing. See /verify for the pre-filing tool.
SC California · Decided 2025-11-07 · Order to Show Cause · AI tool: Implied.
Employment Relations Authority · Decided 2025-11-07 · AI tool: ChatGPT.
CA Texas, Austin · Decided 2025-11-07 · AI tool: Implied.
N.D. California · Decided 2025-11-07 · Admonishment · AI tool: Implied.
D. Minnesota · Decided 2025-11-07 · Complaint dismissed with prejudice · AI tool: Unidentified.
D. Puerto Rico · Decided 2025-11-07 · AI tool: Implied.
California SC · Decided 2025-11-06 · Order to Show Cause · AI tool: Implied.
E.D. Tennessee · Decided 2025-11-06 · AI tool: Implied.
BC Employment Standards Tribunal · Decided 2025-11-06 · AI tool: Implied.
S.D. Texas (Bankruptcy) · Decided 2025-11-06 · Costs Order; 6 hours CLE on generative AI; provide order to client; Bar referral. · Penalty: 1 USD · AI tool: Unidentified.
Gelderland · Decided 2025-11-06 · Court found several cited rulings non-existent or irrelevant, rejected reliance on that case law, and dismissed the appeal. · AI tool: Implied.
W.D. Michigan · Decided 2025-11-06 · AI tool: Implied.
W.D. Louisiana · Decided 2025-11-06 · Warning · AI tool: Implied.
D. Nevada · Decided 2025-11-05 · Warning · AI tool: Implied.
Corte Suprema de Justicia · Decided 2025-11-05 · Order quashed · AI tool: Implied.
D. New Mexico · Decided 2025-11-05 · Warning · AI tool: Implied.
Queensland IRC · Decided 2025-11-05 · AI tool: ChatGPT.
High Court · Decided 2025-11-04 · AI tool: Google AI Overview.
E.D. Wisconsin · Decided 2025-11-04 · AI tool: Implied.
N.D. Indiana · Decided 2025-11-04 · AI tool: Implied.
D. Kansas · Decided 2025-11-04 · Warning · AI tool: Implied.
W.D. Wisconsin · Decided 2025-11-04 · Warning · AI tool: Implied.
CA California · Decided 2025-11-04 · Show Cause Order · AI tool: Implied.
D. New Jersey · Decided 2025-11-03 · Court required counsel to certify completion of an AI seminar · AI tool: ChatGPT.
OG · Decided 2025-11-03 · AI tool: Implied.
High Court · Decided 2025-11-03 · AI tool: Unidentified.
SC New York · Decided 2025-11-03 · Warning · AI tool: Implied.
CA Indiana · Decided 2025-11-03 · Warning · AI tool: Implied.
Get the Sanctions Alert — a new issue every time a ruling lands.
Free double-opt-in newsletter. Case, sanction, fake cites, lesson. No promotional content.
Informational only. Not legal advice. Data derived from public court records; corrections at /contact.