Gilles Dulac c. Ville de Gatineau
TA Québec · Decided 2025-10-11 · AI tool: Implied.
20 AI-hallucination sanctions decided between 2025-10-06 and 2025-10-12 (ISO week 2025-W41). Every ruling below is sourced from the public docket — case name, decided date, outcome, AI tool implicated (when named), and any monetary penalty language pulled verbatim from the ruling.
20 rulings landed on the docket between 2025-10-06 and 2025-10-12. The most common recorded outcome this week was Warning (3 of 20). Of the 20 rulings, 4 carried an explicit monetary penalty in the ruling text.
Implied was the most-implicated AI tool this week (courts rarely require the attorney to name the tool by product name on the record; “Implied” means the ruling described an AI-generated brief without a product name).
The pattern each week is remarkably stable: existence failures (Layer 1) dominate. Attorneys file briefs containing citations that do not exist in any primary source — usually because a general-purpose LLM fabricated the citation and no deterministic pre-filing check caught it. Every ruling below is a preventable filing. See /verify for the pre-filing tool.
TA Québec · Decided 2025-10-11 · AI tool: Implied.
S.D. New York · Decided 2025-10-11 · AI tool: Implied.
S.D. Alabama · Decided 2025-10-10 · Public reprimand, referral and order to notify jurisdictions; monetary sanction · Penalty: 5000 · AI tool: Ghostwriter Legal.
N.D. California · Decided 2025-10-10 · Monetary Sanction, Order to notify client, complete CLE, and Bar informed · Penalty: 1000 USD · AI tool: Implied.
E.D. Texas · Decided 2025-10-10 · Magistrate Judge's recommendation adopted; in forma pauperis denied; plaintiff ordered to pay $405 filing fee within 10 days or the case will be dismissed. · AI tool: Unidentified.
HRT Ontario · Decided 2025-10-09 · AI tool: Implied.
Employment Tribunals (Cambridge) · Decided 2025-10-09 · AI tool: Unidentified.
D. New Mexico · Decided 2025-10-08 · Warning · AI tool: Implied.
Fair Work Commission · Decided 2025-10-08 · AI tool: Unidentified.
CA Ohio · Decided 2025-10-08 · Court rejected reliance on the cited authorities · AI tool: Implied.
AP Alicante · Decided 2025-10-08 · Bar referral · AI tool: Implied.
BCPAAB · Decided 2025-10-07 · Breach of Board's Code of Conduct · Penalty: 910 CAD · AI tool: Implied.
S.D. Ohio · Decided 2025-10-07 · Warning · AI tool: Implied.
CBCA · Decided 2025-10-07 · Claim denied; reimbursement of moving costs denied. · AI tool: Unidentified.
D. Kansas · Decided 2025-10-07 · Warning · AI tool: Implied.
Oberster Gerichtshof · Decided 2025-10-07 · AI tool: Unidentified.
High Court Bombay · Decided 2025-10-06 · Assessment quashed and set aside · AI tool: Implied.
Upper Tribunal · Decided 2025-10-06 · Show Cause Order · AI tool: ChatGPT.
W.D. Pennsylvania · Decided 2025-10-06 · Monetary Sanction; Pro Hac Vice status revoked · Penalty: 5000 USD · AI tool: Implied.
N.D. California · Decided 2025-10-06 · Order to refile motion without hallucinations; Counsel to send Order to Bar and client · AI tool: Unidentified.
Get the Sanctions Alert — a new issue every time a ruling lands.
Free double-opt-in newsletter. Case, sanction, fake cites, lesson. No promotional content.
Informational only. Not legal advice. Data derived from public court records; corrections at /contact.