Nicholas George DiCristina v. The Department of Employment Security, et al.
CA Illinois · Decided 2025-09-12 · AI tool: Implied.
15 AI-hallucination sanctions decided between 2025-09-08 and 2025-09-14 (ISO week 2025-W37). Every ruling below is sourced from the public docket — case name, decided date, outcome, AI tool implicated (when named), and any monetary penalty language pulled verbatim from the ruling.
15 rulings landed on the docket between 2025-09-08 and 2025-09-14. The most common recorded outcome this week was Warning (3 of 15). Of the 15 rulings, 5 carried an explicit monetary penalty in the ruling text.
Implied was the most-implicated AI tool this week (courts rarely require the attorney to name the tool by product name on the record; “Implied” means the ruling described an AI-generated brief without a product name).
The pattern each week is remarkably stable: existence failures (Layer 1) dominate. Attorneys file briefs containing citations that do not exist in any primary source — usually because a general-purpose LLM fabricated the citation and no deterministic pre-filing check caught it. Every ruling below is a preventable filing. See /verify for the pre-filing tool.
CA Illinois · Decided 2025-09-12 · AI tool: Implied.
C.D. California · Decided 2025-09-12 · Monetary sanction; additional reporting and certification requirements; bar reerral · Penalty: 13000 USD · AI tool: ChatGPT.
CA California · Decided 2025-09-12 · Monetary Sanction; State Bar notified; opinion to be served on client. · Penalty: 10000 USD · AI tool: Unidentified.
C.D. California · Decided 2025-09-12 · Monetary sanction; Order to notify State Bar and compliance declaration · Penalty: 2418 USD · AI tool: Unidentified.
Family Court · Decided 2025-09-12 · Warning · AI tool: Unidentified.
W.D. Tennessee · Decided 2025-09-11 · Warning · AI tool: Unidentified.
S.D. Ohio · Decided 2025-09-11 · Warning · AI tool: Implied.
M.D. Florida · Decided 2025-09-11 · Show Cause Order · AI tool: Implied.
Régie du bâtiment du Québec · Decided 2025-09-11 · Disregarded AI-generated arguments · AI tool: ChatGPT.
W.D. Oklahoma · Decided 2025-09-09 · Plaintiff's claims dismissed with prejudice · AI tool: Unidentified.
E.D. California · Decided 2025-09-09 · Monetary sanction; Order to be server on client; State Bar notified · Penalty: 1500 USD · AI tool: Implied.
SC California · Decided 2025-09-09 · Terminating sanction: second amended complaint struck; entire action dismissed with prejudice. · AI tool: Unidentified.
D. Incheon · Decided 2025-09-09 · AI tool: Implied.
CA Maryland · Decided 2025-09-09 · Allegations on Appeal · AI tool: Implied.
DC Minnesota · Decided 2025-09-08 · Briefs stricken; Bar Referral; Monetary Sanction. · Penalty: 5000 USD · AI tool: VLex Fastcase.
Get the Sanctions Alert — a new issue every time a ruling lands.
Free double-opt-in newsletter. Case, sanction, fake cites, lesson. No promotional content.
Informational only. Not legal advice. Data derived from public court records; corrections at /contact.