Reilly v. Conn. Interlocal Risk Mgmt. Agency
D. Connecticut · Decided 2025-06-20 · Warning · AI tool: Implied.
Sanctions — Week of 2025-06-16
8 AI-hallucination sanctions decided between 2025-06-16 and 2025-06-22 (ISO week 2025-W25). Every ruling below is sourced from the public docket — case name, decided date, outcome, AI tool implicated (when named), and any monetary penalty language pulled verbatim from the ruling.
Week at a glance
- Total rulings
- 8
- With monetary penalty
- 1 of 8
- Courts
- 8
- ISO week
- 2025-W25
Outcomes this week
- Warning2
- Costs To The Claimant In The Amount Of $200.1
- The Appeal Was Denied, And The Trial Court's Decision Was Affirmed.1
- The Second Defendant's Notice Of Motion For Summary Dismissal Of The Plaintiff’s Claim Was Dismissed, With Costs Reserved To The Trial Judge.1
- Warning; No Costs Awarded For The Appeal Since Both Sides Seemingly Erred1
AI tool implicated
- Implied3
- Unidentified3
- ChatGPT1
- ChatGTP1
This week’s read-across
8 rulings landed on the docket between 2025-06-16 and 2025-06-22. The most common recorded outcome this week was Warning (2 of 8). Of the 8 rulings, 1 carried an explicit monetary penalty in the ruling text.
Implied was the most-implicated AI tool this week (courts rarely require the attorney to name the tool by product name on the record; “Implied” means the ruling described an AI-generated brief without a product name).
The pattern each week is remarkably stable: existence failures (Layer 1) dominate. Attorneys file briefs containing citations that do not exist in any primary source — usually because a general-purpose LLM fabricated the citation and no deterministic pre-filing check caught it. Every ruling below is a preventable filing. See /verify for the pre-filing tool.
All rulings, week of 2025-06-16
Pro Health Solutions Ltd v ProHealth Inc
Intellectual Property Office · Decided 2025-06-20 · Warning; No costs awarded for the appeal since both sides seemingly erred · AI tool: ChatGPT.
Monfared v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
IRB · Decided 2025-06-20 · AI tool: ChatGTP.
Bottrill v Graham & Anor (No 2)
District Court of New South Wales · Decided 2025-06-20 · The second defendant's Notice of Motion for summary dismissal of the plaintiff’s claim was dismissed, with costs reserved to the trial judge. · AI tool: Unidentified.
J.R.V. v. N.L.V.
SC British Columbia · Decided 2025-06-19 · Costs to the claimant in the amount of $200. · Penalty: 200 CAD · AI tool: Unidentified.
UB v Secretary of State for the Home Department
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) · Decided 2025-06-18 · AI tool: Unidentified.
Attorney General v. $32,000 in Canadian Currency
Ontario SCJ · Decided 2025-06-16 · Warning · AI tool: Implied.
In re Marriage of Isom and Kareem
CA Illinois · Decided 2025-06-16 · The appeal was denied, and the trial court's decision was affirmed. · AI tool: Implied.
Courts represented this week
Nearby weeks
Get the Sanctions Alert — a new issue every time a ruling lands.
Free double-opt-in newsletter. Case, sanction, fake cites, lesson. No promotional content.
Informational only. Not legal advice. Data derived from public court records; corrections at /contact.