Skip to main content
Citation Safe

Sanctions — Week of 2025-05-05

5 AI-hallucination sanctions decided between 2025-05-05 and 2025-05-11 (ISO week 2025-W19). Every ruling below is sourced from the public docket — case name, decided date, outcome, AI tool implicated (when named), and any monetary penalty language pulled verbatim from the ruling.

Week at a glance

Total rulings
5
With monetary penalty
1 of 5
Courts
4
ISO week
2025-W19

Outcomes this week

  • Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral1
  • No Sanction Imposed; Judge Criticized The Error As A “disgrace”; Granted Partial Relief To Applicant1
  • Referral To Public Solicitor And Png Law Society; Order To Show Cause1
  • Striking Of Briefs; Denial Of Requested Discovery Relief; Large Monetary Sanctions Jointly And Severally Against The Two Law Firms1
  • Warning1

AI tool implicated

  • ChatGPT1
  • CoCounsel, Westlaw Precision, Google Gemini1
  • Implied1
  • Lexis+AI1
  • Unidentified1

This week’s read-across

5 rulings landed on the docket between 2025-05-05 and 2025-05-11. The most common recorded outcome this week was Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral (1 of 5). Of the 5 rulings, 1 carried an explicit monetary penalty in the ruling text.

ChatGPT was the most-implicated AI tool this week.

The pattern each week is remarkably stable: existence failures (Layer 1) dominate. Attorneys file briefs containing citations that do not exist in any primary source — usually because a general-purpose LLM fabricated the citation and no deterministic pre-filing check caught it. Every ruling below is a preventable filing. See /verify for the pre-filing tool.

All rulings, week of 2025-05-05

Courts represented this week

Nearby weeks

Get the Sanctions Alert — a new issue every time a ruling lands.

Free double-opt-in newsletter. Case, sanction, fake cites, lesson. No promotional content.

Informational only. Not legal advice. Data derived from public court records; corrections at /contact.