Skip to main content
Citation Safe

Sanctions — Week of 2025-02-24

5 AI-hallucination sanctions decided between 2025-02-24 and 2025-03-02 (ISO week 2025-W09). Every ruling below is sourced from the public docket — case name, decided date, outcome, AI tool implicated (when named), and any monetary penalty language pulled verbatim from the ruling.

Week at a glance

Total rulings
5
With monetary penalty
3 of 5
Courts
4
ISO week
2025-W09

Outcomes this week

  • $3k Fine + Pro Hac Vice Revoked (drafter); $1k Fine Each (signers); Remedial Actions Noted.1
  • Monetary Sanction + Mandatory Cle On Ai And Legal Ethics1
  • Petition Dismissed On Threshold Grounds For Lack Of Clean Hands And Inadequate Legal Foundation. Petitioner Ordered To Pay Costs1

AI tool implicated

  • Unidentified2
  • ChatGPT1
  • Implied1
  • Internal tool (ChatGPT)1

This week’s read-across

5 rulings landed on the docket between 2025-02-24 and 2025-03-02. The most common recorded outcome this week was $3k Fine + Pro Hac Vice Revoked (drafter); $1k Fine Each (signers); Remedial Actions Noted. (1 of 5). Of the 5 rulings, 3 carried an explicit monetary penalty in the ruling text.

Unidentified was the most-implicated AI tool this week.

The pattern each week is remarkably stable: existence failures (Layer 1) dominate. Attorneys file briefs containing citations that do not exist in any primary source — usually because a general-purpose LLM fabricated the citation and no deterministic pre-filing check caught it. Every ruling below is a preventable filing. See /verify for the pre-filing tool.

All rulings, week of 2025-02-24

Courts represented this week

Nearby weeks

Get the Sanctions Alert — a new issue every time a ruling lands.

Free double-opt-in newsletter. Case, sanction, fake cites, lesson. No promotional content.

Informational only. Not legal advice. Data derived from public court records; corrections at /contact.