Skip to main content
Citation Safe

Sanctions — Week of 2025-02-03

1 AI-hallucination sanction decided between 2025-02-03 and 2025-02-09 (ISO week 2025-W06). Every ruling below is sourced from the public docket — case name, decided date, outcome, AI tool implicated (when named), and any monetary penalty language pulled verbatim from the ruling.

Week at a glance

Total rulings
1
With monetary penalty
0 of 1
Courts
1
ISO week
2025-W06

Outcomes this week

  • The Tribunal Affirmed The Decision Under Review, Rejecting The Applicant's Submissions Based On The Ai-generated Content.1

AI tool implicated

  • Copilot1

This week’s read-across

One AI-hallucination ruling landed on the docket this week. Small-N weeks are the norm — the pattern is set by the trailing 12-week average, not by any individual week’s count.

Copilot was the most-implicated AI tool this week.

The pattern each week is remarkably stable: existence failures (Layer 1) dominate. Attorneys file briefs containing citations that do not exist in any primary source — usually because a general-purpose LLM fabricated the citation and no deterministic pre-filing check caught it. Every ruling below is a preventable filing. See /verify for the pre-filing tool.

All rulings, week of 2025-02-03

Courts represented this week

Nearby weeks

Get the Sanctions Alert — a new issue every time a ruling lands.

Free double-opt-in newsletter. Case, sanction, fake cites, lesson. No promotional content.

Informational only. Not legal advice. Data derived from public court records; corrections at /contact.