Skip to main content
Citation Safe

Sanctions — Week of 2024-12-09

2 AI-hallucination sanctions decided between 2024-12-09 and 2024-12-15 (ISO week 2024-W50). Every ruling below is sourced from the public docket — case name, decided date, outcome, AI tool implicated (when named), and any monetary penalty language pulled verbatim from the ruling.

Week at a glance

Total rulings
2
With monetary penalty
1 of 2
Courts
2
ISO week
2024-W50

Outcomes this week

  • Court Rejected The Submission As Fallacious1
  • Petition Dismissed; ₪1,000 Costs Imposed For Procedural Misconduct And Reliance On Fictitious Case Law1

AI tool implicated

  • Implied1
  • Unidentified1

This week’s read-across

2 rulings landed on the docket between 2024-12-09 and 2024-12-15. The most common recorded outcome this week was Court Rejected The Submission As Fallacious (1 of 2). Of the 2 rulings, 1 carried an explicit monetary penalty in the ruling text.

Implied was the most-implicated AI tool this week (courts rarely require the attorney to name the tool by product name on the record; “Implied” means the ruling described an AI-generated brief without a product name).

The pattern each week is remarkably stable: existence failures (Layer 1) dominate. Attorneys file briefs containing citations that do not exist in any primary source — usually because a general-purpose LLM fabricated the citation and no deterministic pre-filing check caught it. Every ruling below is a preventable filing. See /verify for the pre-filing tool.

All rulings, week of 2024-12-09

Courts represented this week

Nearby weeks

← Prev: 2024-W49 (3)Next: 2024-W51 (2) →

Get the Sanctions Alert — a new issue every time a ruling lands.

Free double-opt-in newsletter. Case, sanction, fake cites, lesson. No promotional content.

Subscribe (free) →Verify your own brief
All weekly digestsFull sanctions databaseVerify your own brief →

Informational only. Not legal advice. Data derived from public court records; corrections at /contact.