X BV in Z v. Tax Inspector
The Hague CA · Decided 2024-06-26 · Arguments rejected; No formal sanction but severe judicial criticism. · AI tool: ChatGPT.
Sanctions — Week of 2024-06-24
1 AI-hallucination sanction decided between 2024-06-24 and 2024-06-30 (ISO week 2024-W26). Every ruling below is sourced from the public docket — case name, decided date, outcome, AI tool implicated (when named), and any monetary penalty language pulled verbatim from the ruling.
Week at a glance
- Total rulings
- 1
- With monetary penalty
- 0 of 1
- Courts
- 1
- ISO week
- 2024-W26
Outcomes this week
- Arguments Rejected; No Formal Sanction But Severe Judicial Criticism.1
AI tool implicated
- ChatGPT1
This week’s read-across
One AI-hallucination ruling landed on the docket this week. Small-N weeks are the norm — the pattern is set by the trailing 12-week average, not by any individual week’s count.
ChatGPT was the most-implicated AI tool this week.
The pattern each week is remarkably stable: existence failures (Layer 1) dominate. Attorneys file briefs containing citations that do not exist in any primary source — usually because a general-purpose LLM fabricated the citation and no deterministic pre-filing check caught it. Every ruling below is a preventable filing. See /verify for the pre-filing tool.
All rulings, week of 2024-06-24
Courts represented this week
Nearby weeks
Get the Sanctions Alert — a new issue every time a ruling lands.
Free double-opt-in newsletter. Case, sanction, fake cites, lesson. No promotional content.
Informational only. Not legal advice. Data derived from public court records; corrections at /contact.