Skip to main content
Citation Safe

Was the sanctioned attorney opposing your firm?

Check their next brief before they file — Opposition Check, $49, no signup. Open Opposition Check →

Get these by email — every new sanction, delivered on the daily 12:00 UTC ingest run.

Free. Full landing page at /sanctions-alert.

Free public database

AI Legal Sanction Case Database

The AI Legal Sanction Case Database is the authoritative, continuously-updated, free index of publicly reported cases where a US or foreign court sanctioned, warned, or issued an order to show cause over AI-hallucinated citations in a legal filing. According to Citation Safe’s public sanctions database, courts have addressed AI-citation problems in 1000 reported cases tracked here as of today, spanning 2023–2026. New cases are ingested daily.

Cases tracked
2,103
Courts covered
396
Cases with a reported penalty
372
USD-denominated penalties
$1,361,828
across 206 USD cases — other currencies not converted

This is the structured dataset: every row here is a live, queryable record — sortable and filterable by jurisdiction, AI tool, judge, and year, with results pulled fresh on every request. Download the full dataset as CSV. For curated write-ups of the highest-profile entries — case background, why each sanction happened, what to take from it — see the AI Hallucination Sanctions Tracker, our editorial companion to this database.

2,103 cases match these filters · page 2 of 43

CaseCourtJurisdictionJudgeDecidedAI toolOutcomePenaltySource
Lo v. The Owners, Strata Plan LMS4555Civil Resolution Tribunal of British ColumbiaCanada—2026-09-23Implied—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Mulqueen v. CoddingtonN.D. New YorkUSA—2026-09-23Implied—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
R. M. v. MohrCA OregonUSA—2026-09-23UnidentifiedMonetary Sanction250 USDCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Ryan v. PerezCA Florida (3d)USA—2026-09-23ImpliedWarningNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Williams v. Wogan Group, LLC d/b/a Chapel Ridge Apartments of Forrest CityCA Arkansas (1d)USA—2026-09-23ImpliedAppeal dismissed for briefing deficiencies, including reliance on fictitious cases.None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Garner v. Transit Employees Federal Credit UnionD. D.C.USA—2026-09-22ImpliedOrder to Show CauseNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Goel v. CanadaFederal CourtCanada—2026-09-22Implied—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
In re Marriage of Maslii v. IvanovaCA Illinois (1d)USA—2026-09-22ImpliedWarningNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Kimberly Dean v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationD. ArizonaUSA—2026-09-22Implied—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Posey v. BushnellSC IdahoUSA—2026-09-22ImpliedAppeal affirmedNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
The King (on the application of Sergio Graft) v Willesden County CourtAdministrative CourtUK—2026-09-22Implied—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of International TradeUSA—2026-09-22ImpliedOrder to show causeNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Dirir c. Conseil des écoles publiques de l’est de l’OntarioHRT OntarioCanada—2026-09-21UnidentifiedWarningNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Moffett v. Ally Capital CorporationD. ArizonaUSA—2026-09-21ImpliedWarningNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Englert v. Gateway Crossing Property Owners Association, Inc.CA IndianaUSA—2026-09-18ImpliedAdverse Costs Order Affirmed23222Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
In re Estate of Ruth M. GerdesCA Illinois (2d)USA—2026-09-18ImpliedOrder to Show CauseNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
In re John Daniel DeaneD. Maine (Bankruptcy)USA—2026-09-18Implied—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Whitfield v. Prime AgencyE.D. PennsylvaniaUSA—2026-09-18ImpliedOrder to Show CauseNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Woodard v. Texas Family Care Network et al.E.D. TexasUSA—2026-09-18Implied—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Cabrera Thompson v. Seattle Public SchoolsW.D. WashingtonUSA—2026-09-17ImpliedWarningNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Risner v. Starke CountyN.D. IndianaUSA—2026-09-17Implied—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Varela v. HauserCA Arizona (1d)USA—2026-09-17ImpliedAction forfeitedNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
II SAB/Po 175/26WSA w PoznaniuPoland—2026-09-16Implied—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
In re Violet G.CA California (2d)USA—2026-09-16ImpliedWarningNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Lisandrillo v. PalozziFla. 4th DCAUSA—2026-09-16UnidentifiedPetition denied; counsel ordered to show cause, without using AI, why sanctions including possible Florida Bar referral should not be imposed.None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
B.V. v. RamanahHRT OntarioCanada—2026-09-15ImpliedWritten Submissions IgnoredNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Beard v. Frasier et al.E.D. MissouriUSA—2026-09-15ImpliedCase dismissed with prejudiceNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Bell v. City of Clairton et al.W.D. PennsylvaniaUSA—2026-09-15Lexis AIFour hours of CLE and CM/ECF filing trainingNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Credit One Finance Limited v Cheung Yiu Cho and anotherDistrict CourtChina—2026-09-15Unidentified—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Jamieson v Halifax Regional Centre for EducationNova Scotia Labour BoardCanada—2026-09-15ImpliedAppeal dismissed; the Officer’s decision was upheld. No specific sanction was imposed for the fabricated authority.None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Moore v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueTax CourtUSA—2026-09-15Implied—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Neill-Fraser v Tasmania Parole BoardSupreme Court of TasmaniaAustralia—2026-09-15UnidentifiedGag-order condition set asideNone reportedSource (perthnow.com.au)
Dey v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 2)Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)Australia—2026-09-14UnidentifiedPersonal costs order of AUD 9,600 against the lawyer; no referral to the regulator; lawyer publicly named and reprimanded through the reasons and orders.1Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Henry v. Long Island UniversityE.D. New YorkUSA—2026-09-14ImpliedTwo-year filing-disclosure sanctionNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Matter of H2L Solutions, Inc.GAOUSA—2026-09-14ImpliedWarningNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Moszkowski v. DeepGulf, Inc. and Toke Oil and Gas, S.A.Florida (1d)USA—2026-09-14ImpliedWarningNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Tiekert v. Village of Mamaroneck, et al.S.D.N.Y.USA—2026-09-14ChatGPTAttorney Brian M. Higbie was found to have violated Rule 11 and sanctioned $500, required to complete two New York CLE credits on AI ethics, disclose future GenAI use in filings, and serve the order on his client.1Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Virgil v. Experian Information Solutions, et al.S.D. IndianaUSA—2026-09-11ImpliedMonetary Sanction10000 USDCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Roman v. TD Bank, N.A.S.D. TexasUSA—2026-09-10Implied—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Ulysse v. Vineland Investment Partners Phase II, LLCCA Florida (6d)USA—2026-09-10ImpliedOrder to Show CauseNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Beus Gilbert PLLC v. Brigham Young University et al.D. UtahUSA—2026-09-09ClearBrief, Claude, ChatGPT, and GeminiTwo AI-ethics CLE courses; Monetary Sanctions3000 USDCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Fay v. Warren Hospitality Suites, Inc.E.D. MichiganUSA—2026-09-09UnidentifiedMonetary Sanction10000 USDCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Jaber v. Title Premier, LLC et al.E.D. MissouriUSA—2026-09-09Implied—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
King v. AT&T Corp. et al.W.D. WashingtonUSA—2026-09-09ImpliedOrder to Show CauseNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLPKB AlbertaCanada—2026-09-09ImpliedFictitious citations undermined the reliability of Kostic’s affidavit evidenceNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Parvaz v. KNJ Realty, Inc.SC New YorkUSA—2026-09-09UnidentifiedAdmonishmentNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Pennmark Coventry Holdings, LLC v. Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc.E.D. PennsylvaniaUSA—2026-09-09Implied—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Piikani Nation v Raymond James Ltd.KB AlbertaCanada—2026-09-09Implied—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
XX v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP (2026 ABKB 626)KB AlbertaCanada—2026-09-09ImpliedFictitious citations undermined the reliability of Kostic’s affidavit evidenceNone reportedNo source on file
Youssian v Village of Kings PointSC New YorkUSA—2026-09-09Spellbook AIPetition and amended petition stricken; Monetary Sanction; Adverse Costs Order15000 USDCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)

This database aggregates publicly reported court sanctions and orders over AI-hallucinated citations. It is informational only, not legal advice, and not a complete record of every such case nationwide — see our free citation checker to verify your own filings before this happens to you.