Was the sanctioned attorney opposing your firm?

Check their next brief before they file — Opposition Check, $49, no signup. Open Opposition Check →

Get these by email — every new sanction, delivered on the daily 12:00 UTC ingest run.

Free. Full landing page at /sanctions-alert.

Free public database

AI Legal Sanction Case Database

Name: AI Legal Sanction Case Database
Creator: Citation Safe
License: https://citationsafe.com/terms

The AI Legal Sanction Case Database is the authoritative, continuously-updated, free index of publicly reported cases where a US or foreign court sanctioned, warned, or issued an order to show cause over AI-hallucinated citations in a legal filing. According to Citation Safe’s public sanctions database, courts have addressed AI-citation problems in 1000 reported cases tracked here as of today, spanning 2023–2026. New cases are ingested daily.

Cases tracked: 1,902
Courts covered: 396
Cases with a reported penalty: 349
USD-denominated penalties: $1,290,986; across 191 USD cases — other currencies not converted

This is the structured dataset: every row here is a live, queryable record — sortable and filterable by jurisdiction, AI tool, judge, and year, with results pulled fresh on every request. Download the full dataset as CSV. For curated write-ups of the highest-profile entries — case background, why each sanction happened, what to take from it — see the AI Hallucination Sanctions Tracker, our editorial companion to this database.

7 cases match these filters · page 1 of 1

Case	Court	Jurisdiction	Judge	Decided	AI tool	Outcome	Penalty	Source
XAI v XAH and another matter	Family Court	Singapore	—	2025-09-03	ChatGPT	Order to pay costs; Required written declaration of generative AI use	1000 SGD	Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Tajudin bin Gulam Rasul and another v Suriaya bte Haja Mohideen	High Court	Singapore	—	2025-09-29	Unidentified	Costs and order to inform client	800 SGD	Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Rajib Kumar Dhali v Maybank Singapore Limited	Magistrate's Court	Singapore	—	2025-10-14	Implied	Misconduct taken into account for adverse costs order	18947 SGD	Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Landscape Engineering Pte Ltd v Dot Safety Solutions Pte Ltd and another	High Court	Singapore	—	2025-10-15	Unidentified	Warning	None reported	Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Tan Hai Peng Micheal and another	High Court	Singapore	—	2025-11-03	Unidentified	—	None reported	Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Forbes Monaco APAC v Kawajiri Seiji	High Court	Singapore	—	2026-01-21	Unidentified	Misconduct taken into account for adverse costs order	30000 SGD	Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Goh Chin Cheng v Choco Up SG Pte Ltd	High Court	Singapore	—	2026-05-04	Implied	Monetary Sanction (not to be passed to client)	900 SGD	Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)

This database aggregates publicly reported court sanctions and orders over AI-hallucinated citations. It is informational only, not legal advice, and not a complete record of every such case nationwide — see our free citation checker to verify your own filings before this happens to you.