Skip to main content
Citation Safe

Was the sanctioned attorney opposing your firm?

Check their next brief before they file — Opposition Check, $49, no signup. Open Opposition Check →

Get these by email — every new sanction, delivered on the daily 12:00 UTC ingest run.

Free. Full landing page at /sanctions-alert.

Free public database

AI Legal Sanction Case Database

The AI Legal Sanction Case Database is the authoritative, continuously-updated, free index of publicly reported cases where a US or foreign court sanctioned, warned, or issued an order to show cause over AI-hallucinated citations in a legal filing. According to Citation Safe’s public sanctions database, courts have addressed AI-citation problems in 1000 reported cases tracked here as of today, spanning 2023–2026. New cases are ingested daily.

Cases tracked
1,902
Courts covered
396
Cases with a reported penalty
349
USD-denominated penalties
$1,290,986
across 191 USD cases — other currencies not converted

This is the structured dataset: every row here is a live, queryable record — sortable and filterable by jurisdiction, AI tool, judge, and year, with results pulled fresh on every request. Download the full dataset as CSV. For curated write-ups of the highest-profile entries — case background, why each sanction happened, what to take from it — see the AI Hallucination Sanctions Tracker, our editorial companion to this database.

43 cases match these filters · page 1 of 1

CaseCourtJurisdictionJudgeDecidedAI toolOutcomePenaltySource
Nº 0600814-85.2022.6.00.0000Tribunal Superior EleitoralBrazil2023-04-14ChatGPTMonetary Sanction2604 BRLCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Mazurek et al. v. ThomazoniParana StateBrazil2025-04-02ChatGPTReferral to the bar; Monetary fine (1% of case value)None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Vilmar Martins dos Santos v. State of ParanaParana StateBrazil2025-04-11ImpliedAppeal dismissed; lawyers warnedNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Nº 5025505-88.2025.8.24.0000/SCTJ San CatarinaBrazil2025-04-16UnidentifiedHabeas Corpus request dismissed; Bar ReferralNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Jamisson Roriz de Santana Andrade v. Tribunal Superior do TrabalhoSupremo Tribunal FederalBrazil2025-05-12Implied use of MobiOffice's AI AssistantCase summarily dismissed; Counsel referred to the Bar Association; Claimant ordered to pay double the costsNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Reclamação (RCL) 78.890 / BASupremo Tribunal FederalBrazil2025-05-12MobiOfficeReclamação found manifestly unfounded; bad faith and monetary sanction (double court costs); OAB and OAB/BA to be notified1Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Rodnei Chagas v. Fabricio Petinelli Vieira CoutinhoTJPR - 18ª Câmara CívelBrazil2025-06-06UnidentifiedAppeal denied; appellant condemned for litigância de má-fé and ordered to pay a fine fixed at 1% of the value of the cause.None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Rodney Chagas v. Fabricio Petinelli Vieira CoutinhoParana StateBrazil2025-06-09UnidentifiedMonetary fine (1% of case value)None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Petry v. Evanlux Esquadrias Ltda.TJ ParanaBrazil2025-06-24UnidentifiedMonetary Fine; Bar Referral1 BRLCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
ATSum 0010525-47.2025.5.03.0037Regional Labour CourtBrazil2025-07-02UnidentifiedMonetary Sanctions1Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Silva Cordeiro v. Municipio de Santana do ParnaibaSão Paulo State TribunalBrazil2025-07-25ImpliedMonetary sanction equivalent to one month of minimum wage1Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Nº 5043726-22.2025.8.24.0000/SCTJ San CatarinaBrazil2025-08-12ImpliedMonetary Fine; Bar Referral1 BRLCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
n. 5392928-50.2025.8.09.0051TJ GoiásBrazil2025-08-18ImpliedMonetary Fine; Bar Referral1 BRLCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Nº 1001467-35.2024.5.02.0467 (ROT)Labour Court 2nd DistrictBrazil2025-09-08UnidentifiedMonetary Fine1 BRLCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Agravo de Instrumento nº 5059805-76.2025.8.24.0000TJ San CatarinaBrazil2025-09-16ImpliedMonetary Fine1 BRLCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Ana Cristina Mendes Sales v. Nemora Elizangela Leite da Silva de CastroTribunal de Justiça de Rondônia (TJRO)Brazil2025-09-17UnidentifiedMonetary Fine; Bar ReferralNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Nº 5005798-22.2025.8.24.0005/SCTJ San CatarinaBrazil2025-09-23ImpliedMonetary Fine1 BRLCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Nº 0006113-73.2025.8.16.0033TJ ParanaBrazil2025-09-26UnidentifiedBar Referral (upheld on appeal)None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
nº 5012855-37.2024.8.09.0137TJ GoiásBrazil2025-09-29ImpliedBar ReferralNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Nº 1.0000.25.200097-1/001 (Antônio Carlos Vieira Barbosa)TJ Minas GeraisBrazil2025-11-19ImpliedBar Referral; Brief Partly StruckNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Silvio Xavier dos Santos v. Estado de Minas GeraisTJ Minas GeraisBrazil2025-11-27UnidentifiedBar ReferralNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
José Carlos Pinto de Faria v. Prevent TWB do Brasil et al.TJ San PauloBrazil2025-12-01ImpliedMonetary Fine; Bar Referral1 BRLCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
n.º 5207056-82.2025.8.09.0011TJ GoiásBrazil2025-12-09ImpliedMonetary Fine; Bar Referral4750 BRLCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Nº 5734510-54.2025.8.09.0051TJ GoiásBrazil2026-02-05ImpliedWarningNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Luiz Carlos Barboza Neves v. Banco Bradesco S.A.TJ Rio de JaneiroBrazil2026-02-23ImpliedCourt found the cited precedents nonexistent, treated the conduct as a serious professional fault but—because the attorney admitted the error—declined to impose sanctions for litigância de má-fé or to refer the matter administratively; underlying sentence (payment of court costs) was upheld.None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Amanda Jacintha de Souza v. Atual Companhia Securitizadora de Créditos FinanceirosTJ Rio de JaneiroBrazil2026-02-24ImpliedBar ReferralNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Nº 1500026-62.2023.8.26.0633/50000TJ San PauloBrazil2026-03-10ImpliedFormal Reprimand; Monetary Fine1 BRLCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Pablo Alexandre Martins dos Santos v. Viver Bem Empreendimentos Imobiliários e Participações Ltda.TJ GoiasBrazil2026-03-17ImpliedMonetary Fine1 BRLCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Ezequiel Cunha de Moura e outro v. Wallace de Moura SilvaTJ-RJBrazil2026-03-30ImpliedBar ReferralNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Agravo de Instrumento Nº 0104033-49.2025.8.16.0000TJPR, 13ª CCBrazil2026-04-08ImpliedCourt found the use of nonexistent or mischaracterized jurisprudence constituted litigância de má-fé; imposed a fine of 1% of the updated value of the cause and ordered communication to OAB/PR for possible disciplinary follow-up.1Case summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Nº 0104033-49.2025.8.16.0000TJ ParanaBrazil2026-04-08ImpliedMonetary Fine; Bar Referral15897 BRLCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Thalita Aparecida Araújo Rosa Campos v. Marcio Abreu RosaTJ Rio de JaneiroBrazil2026-05-06UnidentifiedMonetary Fine; Bar Referral1 BRLCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Nº 0143435-40.2025.8.16.0000TJ ParanaBrazil2026-05-08ImpliedMonetary Fine; Bar Referral3675 BRLCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Mercado E Açougue Sao Lucas Eireli v Pluxee Beneficios BrasilTJ ParanaBrazil2026-05-15ImpliedMonetary Fine; Bar Referral1 BRLCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Autos nº. 0002069-76.2026.8.16.0194 (Manoel Tomaz Budal Filho v. Antonio Carlos Alves Lopes)TJPRBrazil2026-05-25ImpliedTribunal declarou a existência de litigância de má-fé em razão das citações fabricadas, fixou multa de 10% do valor da causa e determinou ofício à OAB; Recurso Especial não admitido.None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Manoel Tomaz Budal Filho v. Antonio Carlos Alves LopesTJ ParanaBrazil2026-05-25ImpliedMonetary Fine; Bar ReferralNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
N° 0001439-38.2024.8.16.0049TJ ParanaBrazil2026-05-29ImpliedMonetary Fine1 BRLCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Apelação Criminal nº 0000711-64.2024.8.16.0156 — Franciely da Silva LuzTJPR, 1ª Câmara CriminalBrazil2026-06-09UnidentifiedCourt admonished the defense lawyer for using AI-created jurisprudence and determined to send copies of the decision and case to the Ordem dos Advogados do Brasil (OAB) for possible action; warned that use of AI-created jurisprudence may lead to non-consideration of the resource.None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Franciely da Silva LuzTJ ParanaBrazil2026-06-09UnidentifiedBar ReferralNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Nº 0004948-60.2026.8.16.0031TJ ParanaBrazil2026-06-12ImpliedMonetary Fine; Bar Referral1 BRLCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Ederaldo Cirino da Luz v. Joaquim Cirino da Luz et al.TJPR - 11ª Câmara CívelBrazil2026-06-23UnidentifiedRecurso não conhecido; multa por litigância de má-fé de 5% do valor da causa; ofício à OAB para apuração da conduta do procurador.None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
N°0035599-44.2017.8.16.0014TJ ParanaBrazil2026-07-22ImpliedAppeal Dismissed; Bar ReferralNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Apelação Cível nº 1032884-04.2025.8.26.0224TJ San PauloBrazil2026-08-13UnidentifiedMonetary Fine; Bar Referral1 BRLCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)

This database aggregates publicly reported court sanctions and orders over AI-hallucinated citations. It is informational only, not legal advice, and not a complete record of every such case nationwide — see our free citation checker to verify your own filings before this happens to you.