Skip to main content
Citation Safe

Was the sanctioned attorney opposing your firm?

Check their next brief before they file — Opposition Check, $49, no signup. Open Opposition Check →

Get these by email — every new sanction, delivered on the daily 12:00 UTC ingest run.

Free. Full landing page at /sanctions-alert.

Free public database

AI Legal Sanction Case Database

The AI Legal Sanction Case Database is the authoritative, continuously-updated, free index of publicly reported cases where a US or foreign court sanctioned, warned, or issued an order to show cause over AI-hallucinated citations in a legal filing. According to Citation Safe’s public sanctions database, courts have addressed AI-citation problems in 1000 reported cases tracked here as of today, spanning 2023–2026. New cases are ingested daily.

Cases tracked
1,902
Courts covered
396
Cases with a reported penalty
349
USD-denominated penalties
$1,290,986
across 191 USD cases — other currencies not converted

This is the structured dataset: every row here is a live, queryable record — sortable and filterable by jurisdiction, AI tool, judge, and year, with results pulled fresh on every request. Download the full dataset as CSV. For curated write-ups of the highest-profile entries — case background, why each sanction happened, what to take from it — see the AI Hallucination Sanctions Tracker, our editorial companion to this database.

8 cases match these filters · page 1 of 1

CaseCourtJurisdictionJudgeDecidedAI toolOutcomePenaltySource
Giacomino y Otros v. Montserrat y OtrosRosario CAArgentina2025-08-22UnidentifiedReferral of the issue to the BarNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
B., V. E. v. C., B. R. Y.CA CórdobaArgentina2025-09-05ImpliedCounsel's Work not Counted for CostsNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Gabriel v. MarecoCA Buenos AiresArgentina2025-09-15ImpliedRecurso de apelación declarado desierto; costas al apelante; se notificará al letrado y al Colegio de Abogados. No se impusieron sanciones profesionales.None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Peugeot Citroen Argentina et al. v. SumarismoCA General RocaArgentina2025-09-18ImpliedCounsel's Work not Counted for Fees; Referral to the BarNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Provincia del Chubut v. PRAChubutArgentina2025-10-15ImpliedJudgment annuled, new trial before different judge orderedNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Elías Axel Roberto Rafael s/ Abuso sexual con acceso carnalCSJ de TucumánArgentina2025-11-28ImpliedAttorney disqualified; Bar referralNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
A.M., F.A. c/ C.N.H y otrosCA Río NegroArgentina2025-12-12ImpliedAdmonishmentNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Ortiz Fatima Cecilia v. Booking.com y otrosJCC de TucumánArgentina2026-02-02ImpliedMonetary sanction, bar referral, adverse costs order620000 ARSCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)

This database aggregates publicly reported court sanctions and orders over AI-hallucinated citations. It is informational only, not legal advice, and not a complete record of every such case nationwide — see our free citation checker to verify your own filings before this happens to you.