Skip to main content
Citation Safe

Was the sanctioned attorney opposing your firm?

Check their next brief before they file — Opposition Check, $49, no signup. Open Opposition Check →

Get these by email — every new sanction, delivered on the daily 12:00 UTC ingest run.

Free. Full landing page at /sanctions-alert.

Free public database

AI Legal Sanction Case Database

The AI Legal Sanction Case Database is the authoritative, continuously-updated, free index of publicly reported cases where a US or foreign court sanctioned, warned, or issued an order to show cause over AI-hallucinated citations in a legal filing. According to Citation Safe’s public sanctions database, courts have addressed AI-citation problems in 1000 reported cases tracked here as of today, spanning 2023–2026. New cases are ingested daily.

Cases tracked
2,109
Courts covered
398
Cases with a reported penalty
374
USD-denominated penalties
$1,400,706
across 207 USD cases — other currencies not converted

This is the structured dataset: every row here is a live, queryable record — sortable and filterable by jurisdiction, AI tool, judge, and year, with results pulled fresh on every request. Download the full dataset as CSV. For curated write-ups of the highest-profile entries — case background, why each sanction happened, what to take from it — see the AI Hallucination Sanctions Tracker, our editorial companion to this database.

73 cases match these filters · page 2 of 2

CaseCourtJurisdictionJudgeDecidedAI toolOutcomePenaltySource
PSAHSC v. TchampetHigh CourtUK—2026-01-30Microsoft Co-PilotWarningNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Brightwaters Energy Limited v Eroton Exploration and Production Company LimitedHigh CourtUK—2026-02-17Unidentified—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Re A, B, C, D (Extension of assessment; Use of AI: hallucinations)Family Court BournemouthUK—2026-03-05Unidentified—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Chevalier-Hernandez v Poplar Dock Management Company LtdFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)UK—2026-03-09ChatGPTThe Applicant withdrew the argument; the Tribunal warned litigants to verify authorities but imposed no sanction.None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Kamal v Tax Policy AssociatesHigh CourtUK—2026-03-11ImpliedPartial strike-out, summary judgment for the defendantsNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
David Jeffs v London Borough of LewishamFirst-tier TribunalUK—2026-03-16UnidentifiedCost-related relief refused in part because of AI misuseNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Wu Leshi v Cheung Long YinLands TribunalUK—2026-03-20ImpliedThe Tribunal rejected the legal assertionNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Brook House (Henley) RTM Company Limited v Henley Brook LimitedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)UK—2026-04-13Implied—None reportedSource (naturalandartificiallaw.com)
Mrs Sabrena Rodney v Gee'z Micro Bar & Pitstop & OthersCounty Court at DudleyUK—2026-04-23UnidentifiedSRA ReferralNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Tuyunuklu v Akmal [2026] UKUT 174 (LC)UKUT (Lands Chamber)UK—2026-05-05Implied—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Omar Rafique v The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and CustomsUKFTT (Tax Chamber)UK—2026-05-06ImpliedWarningNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
World Kuk Sool Association, Inc v Alex PaulIPOUK—2026-05-13ImpliedWarningNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Golden Sphinx Limited v ItkinRoyal Court (Jersey)UK—2026-05-18ImpliedWarningNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Re an Office-Holder; Cork v SmithChanceryUK—2026-05-22UnidentifiedPublic admonishment; SRA ReferralNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Habib & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)UK—2026-06-12ImpliedAppeal dismissed; solicitors and counsel issued a notice to show cause concerning possible wasted costs and referral to the SRA/BSB. No professional sanction or monetary penalty was imposed in this decision.None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Tobosaru v Romania; Tofan v RomaniaHigh CourtUK—2026-07-08Unidentified—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Immigration CaseFirst-Tier Immigration TribunalUK—2026-07-14——None reportedSource (theguardian.com)
iHEAT.ME LTD v The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and CustomsFirst-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)UK—2026-07-23Unidentified—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Lodhia v Twelve TreesKing's BenchUK—2026-07-24UnidentifiedCosts Order; 3-year General Civil Restraint Order; Bar ReferralNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd v Abhishek KumarSolicitors Disciplinary TribunalUK—2026-08-25UnidentifiedCounsel struck off the Register of Foreign LawyersNone reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
HT v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)UK—2026-09-04Implied—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
The King (on the application of Sergio Graft) v Willesden County CourtAdministrative CourtUK—2026-09-22Implied—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
FJ v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentFirst-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)UK—2026-10-01Implied—None reportedCase summary (Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases DB)
← PreviousPage 2 of 2Next →

This database aggregates publicly reported court sanctions and orders over AI-hallucinated citations. It is informational only, not legal advice, and not a complete record of every such case nationwide — see our free citation checker to verify your own filings before this happens to you.