Sanction teardown · CA Kentucky, USA · 2026-07-10

Teresa Jewel Whitten v. Kristopher Brian Everitt

What happened

In CA Kentucky, USA, a filing relied on an unnamed/unconfirmed AI tool to help draft legal argument. The court identified the following problems with the citations in that filing:

• Misrepresented (Case Law)
  Court found the appellant's citation to this case and the quoted proposition are not supported by the decision she cited (mischaracterization of Rankin).
• Fabricated (Case Law)
  Court found this citation does not appear to exist after an exhaustive search and labeled it a hallucinated AI-generated citation.
• Fabricated (Case Law)
  Court found this citation does not appear to exist after an exhaustive search and labeled it a hallucinated AI-generated citation.
• Misrepresented (Case Law)
  Court determined the appellant mischaracterized the holdings of this existing case; the opinion does not support the proposition she attributed to it.
• Misrepresented (Case Law)
  Court noted the appellant provided an incorrect Westlaw citation for this unpublished opinion and that the opinion does not support the claimed proposition.

Which AI tool

an unnamed/unconfirmed AI tool. Note: Charlotin's public database records tool attribution only where a court order, brief, or reporting on the matter states it explicitly; "unidentified" or "implied" means the record indicates AI use but does not name a specific product — we do not guess.

Outcome

Warning

How Citation Safe would have caught this

Citation Safe runs three deterministic layers before a brief is filed: (1) does the citation exist against CourtListener's database of published opinions, (2) if quoted, does that exact language appear in the source, (3) does the cited case actually support the proposition it is cited for. Fabricated case citations fail Layer 1. Fabricated or misattributed quotations fail Layer 2 even when the underlying case is real. Misrepresented holdings — a real case cited for a proposition it does not support — are the target of Layer 3. None of these checks involve asking another language model whether the citation looks right; they are lookups and text-matches against the actual source, which is why a hallucinated citation has to survive a direct lookup against the authoritative source — not another model's opinion — to earn a VERIFIED stamp; our measured false-verify rate is published live at /quality.

Check a brief before you file it → · See our live false-verify rate

Source: https://www.damiencharlotin.com/documents/2604/TERESA_JEWEL_WHITTEN_v._KRISTOPHER_BRIAN_EVERITT_USA_10_July_2026.pdf, via Damien Charlotin's public AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC0).