Skip to main content
Citation Safe

Marion Parnell, Jr. v. Florida Department of Corrections

Court
11th Cir. CA
Jurisdiction
USA
Decided
2026-07-10
AI tool
Implied
Outcome
Brief partly Struck; Adverse Costs Order; Bar Referral
Monetary penalty
None reported

What was hallucinated

False Quotes: Case Law | Reply brief included at least five non-existent quotations attributed to Eleventh Circuit opinions. || Fabricated: Case Law | Reply brief cited two non-existent court opinions.

Sanction teardown · 11th Cir. CA, USA · 2026-07-10

Marion Parnell, Jr. v. Florida Department of Corrections

What happened

In 11th Cir. CA, USA, a filing relied on an unnamed/unconfirmed AI tool to help draft legal argument. The court identified the following problems with the citations in that filing:

  • False Quotes (Case Law)
    Reply brief included at least five non-existent quotations attributed to Eleventh Circuit opinions.
  • Fabricated (Case Law)
    Reply brief cited two non-existent court opinions.

Which AI tool

an unnamed/unconfirmed AI tool. Note: Charlotin's public database records tool attribution only where a court order, brief, or reporting on the matter states it explicitly; "unidentified" or "implied" means the record indicates AI use but does not name a specific product — we do not guess.

Outcome

Brief partly Struck; Adverse Costs Order; Bar Referral

How Citation Safe would have caught this

Citation Safe runs three deterministic layers before a brief is filed: (1) does the citation exist against CourtListener's database of published opinions, (2) if quoted, does that exact language appear in the source, (3) does the cited case actually support the proposition it is cited for. Fabricated case citations fail Layer 1. Fabricated or misattributed quotations fail Layer 2 even when the underlying case is real. Misrepresented holdings — a real case cited for a proposition it does not support — are the target of Layer 3. None of these checks involve asking another language model whether the citation looks right; they are lookups and text-matches against the actual source, which is why a hallucinated citation has to survive a direct lookup against the authoritative source — not another model's opinion — to earn a VERIFIED stamp; our measured false-verify rate is published live at /quality.

Check a brief before you file it → · See our live false-verify rate

Source: https://www.damiencharlotin.com/documents/2594/Parnell_v._Florida_Dep_Cor._USA_10_July_2026.pdf, via Damien Charlotin's public AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC0).

Source: https://www.damiencharlotin.com/documents/2594/Parnell_v._Florida_Dep_Cor._USA_10_July_2026.pdf

Don’t be the next case in this database.

Citation Safe checks every citation against primary sources before it reaches a filing.