Sanction teardown · Montgomery CC, Ohio, USA · 2026-04-30
Ascent Management, Inc. et al v. Shell Oil Company et al
What happened
In Montgomery CC, Ohio, USA, a filing relied on an unnamed/unconfirmed AI tool to help draft legal argument. The court identified the following problems with the citations in that filing:
-
Fabricated (Case Law)November 5, 2024 filing cited 'Perrico v. Verizon, 2018-Ohio-3994.' Court found no such opinion on search and treated it as a fabricated citation.
-
Misrepresented (Case Law)December 3, 2024 filing cited 'Kyser v. Summit County Children Services, 2022-Ohio-1207,' but court's search showed the reporter corresponds to a different case.
-
Misrepresented (Case Law)Citation to 'In re Fuel Adjustment Clauses for Columbus S. Power Co. & Ohio Power Co., 41 Ohio St.2d 41' was misattributed; reporter corresponds to a different named opinion.
-
Misrepresented (Case Law)Citation to 'Baker v. Coast to Coast Manpower, LLC, 2020-Ohio-4533' corresponded to a different published decision on search.
Which AI tool
an unnamed/unconfirmed AI tool. Note: Charlotin's public database records tool attribution only where a court order, brief, or reporting on the matter states it explicitly; "unidentified" or "implied" means the record indicates AI use but does not name a specific product — we do not guess.
Outcome
Adverse Costs Order (monetary penalty: 5237 USD.)
How Citation Safe would have caught this
Citation Safe runs three deterministic layers before a brief is filed: (1) does the citation exist against CourtListener's database of published opinions, (2) if quoted, does that exact language appear in the source, (3) does the cited case actually support the proposition it is cited for. Fabricated case citations fail Layer 1. Fabricated or misattributed quotations fail Layer 2 even when the underlying case is real. Misrepresented holdings — a real case cited for a proposition it does not support — are the target of Layer 3. None of these checks involve asking another language model whether the citation looks right; they are lookups and text-matches against the actual source, which is why a hallucinated citation has to survive a direct lookup against the authoritative source — not another model's opinion — to earn a VERIFIED stamp; our measured false-verify rate is published live at /quality.
Check a brief before you file it → · See our live false-verify rate
Source: https://www.damiencharlotin.com/documents/2464/Ascent_Management_v._Shell_USA_30_April_2026.pdf, via Damien Charlotin's public AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC0).