LiveVideo.AI Corp. v. Redstone
S.D. New York
- Judge
- —
- Date filed
- —
- Sanctioned
- 2026-06-09
- AI tool
- Implied
- Monetary penalty
- 80056 USD
- Outcome
- Adverse Costs Order; Bar Referral
What happened
LiveVideo.AI Corp. v. Redstone was decided 2026-06-09 in S.D. New York. The court found that filings in this matter contained AI-generated citations that could not be verified against any primary source.
Court outcome: Adverse Costs Order; Bar Referral.
The fabricated citations
Fabricated: Case Law
Struck motions contained hallucinated, non-existent case citations asserted as authority; court found no real authority supporting the arguments.
Fabricated: Case Law
Filings contained non-existent quotations attributed to cases (fabricated quotations) that could not be verified by the court.
Fabricated: Other
Documents exhibited formatting identical to AI output and included remnants of drafting prompts, indicating AI-generated submissions.
How Citation Safe would have caught this
Citation Safe would have flagged the fabricated and misrepresented citations documented in this opinion by cross-checking each cite string against CourtListener's primary-source database of federal and state opinions, and by comparing every quoted passage against the actual text of the cited source. The pattern above (mix of non-existent cites and real cites paired with fabricated quotations) is the exact failure mode the tool is built to catch.
Sources
Run Opposition Check on any brief you’re about to file for — $49.
Full annotated report on every citation in the opposing filing. Attach it to your Rule 11 or sanctions motion.