Skip to main content
Citation Safe
← All teardowns

Compiled by Citation Safe (Digital Empire Holdings LLC) from the court’s published sanction order (decided August 20, 2026). Quotes and case details come from the order itself — check the primary source before relying on them.

Sanction teardown · D. Delaware, USA · 2026-08-20

Disruptive Resources, LLC v. Ballistic Barrier Products Inc. et al.

What happened

In D. Delaware, USA, a filing relied on Strongsuit to help draft legal argument. The court identified the following problems with the citations in that filing:

  • Misrepresented (Exhibits & Submissions)
    Two sections of the Joint Claim Construction Brief contained a concluding statement proposing an incorrect claim construction generated by AI; counsel missed a one-page section when editing.
  • Misrepresented (Exhibits & Submissions)
    A third section of the brief contained pervasive AI-generated errors and was withdrawn; counsel used the AI to pull deposition statements and integrate extrinsic evidence, producing inaccuracies.

Which AI tool

Strongsuit. Note: Charlotin's public database records tool attribution only where a court order, brief, or reporting on the matter states it explicitly; "unidentified" or "implied" means the record indicates AI use but does not name a specific product — we do not guess.

Outcome

Warning

How Citation Safe would have caught this

Citation Safe runs three deterministic layers before a brief is filed: (1) does the citation exist against CourtListener's database of published opinions, (2) if quoted, does that exact language appear in the source, (3) does the cited case actually support the proposition it is cited for. Fabricated case citations fail Layer 1. Fabricated or misattributed quotations fail Layer 2 even when the underlying case is real. Misrepresented holdings — a real case cited for a proposition it does not support — are the target of Layer 3. None of these checks involve asking another language model whether the citation looks right; they are lookups and text-matches against the actual source, which is why a hallucinated citation has to survive a direct lookup against the authoritative source — not another model's opinion — to earn a VERIFIED stamp; our measured false-verify rate is published live at /quality.

Check a brief before you file it → · See our live false-verify rate

Source: https://www.damiencharlotin.com/documents/2925/Disruptive_Resources_LLC_v._Ballistic_Barrier_Products_USA_20_August_2026.pdf, via Damien Charlotin's public AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC0).